Back to Top

Regional Open Space in SEQ – Supplementary documents

Those public servants who were within the relevant departments at the time (Lands/Natural Resources, Local Government and Planning, Premier and Cabinet, Environment especially), including the author of this post, are aware of the enormous effort invested in establishing a regional open space system worth the name and the large trove of documents produced in the process.

Some of the documents reproduced here are in the public domain and always have been; some have never previously been published but have fallen into PaRC’s hands by the agency of various public-spirited individuals. They are in no particular order. See also our sister site the Document Library which has a large trove.

 

2008 SEQ LIVING LANDSCAPES FORUM – REGIONAL LANDSCAPE AND OPEN SPACE COMMITTEE: BOONAH CULTURAL CENTRE 10-12 SEPTEMBER 2008 – also see P Mackay’s report

Queensland Greenspace Strategy 2011-2020

Regional Open Space System Business Plan 6 August 1994

Brisbane Institute’s Green Space Audit for SEQ August 2004

Regional Landscape and Open Space Advisory Committee Workshop 29 November 2004 – Input to latest iteration of the Regional Plan

 

Proceedings of the Regional Landscape Strategy Advisory Committee (ROLSAC)

Final Implementation Report November 2003
RLOSAC Advisory Committee Meeting # 3 Agenda 7 February 2005

 

 

Review Status: Pending

Cost-benefit and alternatives

Renowned Australian planner Marcus Spiller, Principal of the eminent planning and economics firm SGS, has granted approval to upload some signature documents to PaRC.

This one, Assessing net community benefit in the Victorian planning system, dated 18 October 2022, deserves a much greater readership than the title might suggest. Every economist and planner who uses benefit cost analysis should read this insightful account.

Review Status: Pending
Posted in Narratives |

Parkland surrendered at time of subdivision

In the late 1990s, the planning profession in Australia became enthusiastic about performance-based planning, by which applicants for development were supposed to justify their projects in terms of satisfaction of idealised principles, as distinct from the prescriptive planning by which applicants hitherto were required to satisfy detailed or at least specified standards. Whether by design or as an unintended consequence, this shift has been beneficial to the property industry as it placed local government officers and public servants on the defensive in attempting to condition developments so that ample public space is brought into public ownership to cater for the needs of new residents.

Practice between local governments and between states has long been disparate. In Victoria, the legislation specified a minimum charge and some local governments used the provision to extract large tracts of open space. For example, the  Shire of Sherbrooke negotiated sometimes as much as 90% open space contribution, in steep or fire-prone localities of the Dandenong Ranges (such as became the Selby Bushland Reserve). By contrast, in Queensland prior to 1997, legislation specified a maximum statutory charge, reflecting the state’s pro-development ethos.

In developing localities, it’s vital that sufficiently large corridors of land are reserved for public purposes and it’s particularly important that floodplains, wetlands and ridgelines be reserved from incompatible development and (in the case of watercourses) to allow space for soft engineering works to manage stormwater.

The Land Planning Branch of the Queensland Department of Natural Resources sought to draft some guidelines for planning officers in local governments and departmental staff in dealing with development applications. The intention was to provide an authoritative benchmark to fortify officers in negotiations with developers and even perhaps in court. Jeremy Addison, a qualified planner and an officer of the Department, produced a draft working paper that was not considered finalised and was not published by the Department. It is replete with references to the statutory planning and land tenure legislation in operation in Queensland in the late 1990s-early 2000s, after the passage of the (now superseded) Integrated Planning Act 1997. It is included here because there are few known similar guidelines in public circulation and so the paper has contemporary value beyond historical interest. Its shortcomings should not be attributed to Mr Addison.

 

The “Parkland Surrender” paper addresses how much land should be offered up for public purposes in new subdivisions like this site of a proposed estate at Caboolture West, South East Queensland.

 

Surrender by developers is not the only method and perhaps not the most effective method of securing public open space. Melbourne’s metropolitan parks system, including Petty’s demonstration orchard at Templestowe, was funded by a general “metropolitan improvement” rate.

 

Some notes

In Queensland, performance-based planning was introduced in the Integrated Planning Act 1997, modelled on the Resource Management Act of New Zealand, although without any provisions for allocating (privatising) state land or mineral assets.

Previous legislation had specified that land taken at subdivision was to be surrendered to the Crown and then (usually) reserved for public purposes with the local government being invited to serve as trustee. Local governments objected to this safety net provision which provided a brake against disposal of the parkland, because (they argued) it was easier to rationalise their park holdings and sell isolated pockets if held as freehold. Yes, small pockets of land are inherently more expensive to maintain than a comparable acreage added to a large district park, but they are serving a different clientele.

It has been argued that land surrendered at subdivision is a tax upon the future residents, so only land of benefit to them should be taken; in other words government has no right to levy developers on behalf of users in a regional or or remote catchment. However, subdivision is a privilege, not a right, and a district- or regional-scale surrender is appropriate, so long as the levy is for a public interest purpose and is permitted by the legislation. (The precise wording of the legislation is critical).

Invitation to planners and landscape designers

Critical feedback is invited from any person with survey or planning expertise and who would like to collaborate with PaRC in building the working paper Parkland Surrender at Time of Subdivision into a modern guideline applicable across Australia, New Zealand and Pacific Islands. Please contact secretary @ parcaustralia.com.au. PaRC would also like to know of other comparable current or historical guidelines that can be re-published here.

UPDATE 2024

Eminent planner Marcus Spiller has drawn attention to an Occasional Paper on this subject, Public Open Space Contributions in Victoria.

 

Review Status: Pending

Open Space Contributions in Victoria

Renowned planner Dr Marcus Spiller, Principal of the eminent planning and economics firm SGS, has granted approval to upload some signature documents to PaRC.

 

In 2024, Dr Spiller and colleague Jo Noesgaard  published an Occasional Paper proposing a preferred approach to the calculation of public open space (POS) development
contributions under Victorian legislation. Councils rely heavily on development contributions under Cl53.01 of the Victoria Planning Provisions to acquire and develop public open space. However, there is little formal guidance from the State Government as to how the rates which are potentially enshrined in Cl53.01 might be calculated and strategically justified.

Business as usual arrangements, under which most of metropolitan Melbourne is covered by contribution rates of 5 per cent or less of site value, would see a rapid
deterioration of access to POS given the projected strong growth of the city. As councils go about reviewing their Cl53.01 rates, it is important that they have regard to four key principles.

These include:

  • treating the municipality as one planning unit;
  • ensuring that POS supply is adequate in quantum, accessibility, and quality;
  • applying contribution obligations equitably regardless of the timing of development; and
    applying contributions to all land use types.

This timely and authoritative report complements an earlier post on PaRC Parkland surrender at time of subdivision featuring a draft guideline by Queenslander Jeremy Addision.

Review Status: Pending

Valuing Good Urban Design


Renowned Australian planner Marcus Spiller, Principal of the eminent planning and economics firm SGS, has granted approval to upload some signature documents to PaRC.

A consultancy with Gold Coast City Council resulted in the report Valuing Good Urban Design on the Gold Coast, which includes a substantial account of methodology and the justification for urban design:

 

 

 

 

 

Review Status: Pending

Regional Planning and Regional Coordination – Qld, 1973

This is an important report, dated about 1973, explaining the intentions of the benchmark 1971 legislation the State and Regional Planning and Development, Public Works Organization and Environmental Control Act 1971-1973.

it is an important statement of the views of the Queensland Government of the day about regional land use planning, development planning, consultation and coordination. Published by the Office of the Coordinator-General.

Review Status: Pending

“People Gardening”

Long-term recreation professional Peter Nicholls of Adelaide has generously agreed to provide the substance of materials on his website Australia’s People Gardener for re-presenting and curating on PaRC. Peter’s professional qualifications in the fields of leisure and recreation planning and development include:

 

  • Bachelor of Arts ANU Canberrra 1965
  • Graduate Diploma in Recreation Planning: Canberra University 1975, making him one of the pioneers of the professional recreation movement in Australia
  • Senior Recreation Planner (and various other managerial positions) with the South Australian Department of Recreation and Sport, 1976 – 1994
  • Recreation Planner City of Tea Tree Gully, Adelaide 1994 – 2002
  • Life Member and a past National and State President of his professional association, Parks and Leisure Australia.

A profile of Peter is also preserved on PaRC under the category “Inspirational People“.


NOTE: AS AT 4 SEPTEMBER 2025 THERE HAS BEEN A TEMPORARY SOFTWARE GLITCH WITH THIS PAGE. APOLOGIES TO PETER NICHOLLS AND READERS WHILE PaRC REPAIRS THE PAGE.


THE BENEFITS OF CREATIVE LEISURE INTERESTS

LIST OF LEISURE/RECREATION IDEAS. Although this document includes 2005 in its heading, that is the date it was commenced. Activities have been added continuously since then.

BEING WHO YOU REALLY ARE IS A RISK WORTH TAKING

BEWARE OF THE RETIRED HUSBAND SYNDROME

DARE TO HAVE FAITH IN YOUR DREAMS

DON’T THROW YOUR ABILITIES AWAY. RECYCLE THEM

EMPLOYERS OF CHOICE WHY THEY ATTRACT STAFF LOYALTY

FEAR AND COURAGE THE ODD COUPLE

HOW MUCH WOULD YOU TRUST YOUR TRUE SELF

I WISH I WAS THE ME I ONCE WANTED TO BE

IT’S TIME TO TEAR DOWN THE WALL THAT SEPARATES WORK AND LEISURE

LIFE AFTER WORK WILL BE LIKE NOTHING YOU HAVE EVER KNOWN BEFORE

MY APPROACH TO EXPONENTIAL PERSONAL GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT

MY DREAM FOR THE WORLD

MY LEFT FIELD PERSPECTIVE

SETTING THE STAGE

SPACE THE SEPARATION THAT KEEPS US TOGETHER

THE CHANGING ROLE OF BUSINESS IN MAKING SENSE OF WHY WE ARE HERE

THE ENQUENCHABLE YEARNING TO FOLLOW YOUR HEART

THE GLORIOUS ENIGMA OF UNCERTAINTY

WE NO LONGER ACCEPT LIFE IS OVER WHEN IT

WHY I WANT TO BE A KID AGAIN

WHY IT’S TIME FOR A PARADIGM SHIFT TO CONTINUOUS DEVELOPMENT

 

The above 23 files AGGREGATED

To be continued.

Review Status: Pending

Geoffrey Chapman

 

This post offers some interesting insights to early (post-war) rural life and the early days of the National Parks and Wildlife Service. It also names personnel and their roles.

Geoffrey Ian Chapman was born at the Kingscote Hospital on 21 July 1944. In 1950 Geoff started at Kingscote Primary School and had to first walk from his home at “Brownlow” to the Kingscote Primary school, which was about 3 kilometres. In early 1956, The family finally shifted out to the farm at Birchmore Lagoon and Geoff then had to ride a push bike 9 kilometres to catch the school bus and when huge floods cut off road access, then had to go to the Parndana East Primary School. In 1957 to 1960, Geoff went back to the Kingscote Area School to attend high school.

In December 1960, Geoff started work with stock firm Goldsborough Mort & Co in Kingscote and was later transferred to the Adelaide Head Office.

In late 1961, Geoff left and went home to Kangaroo Island (KI) for a few months to work on his father’s farm for about six months and later and went to work for Pettitt Hardware Company in Adelaide.

In 1963, Geoff’s father purchased the farm opposite and Geoff returned to KI to work on the farms, on the understanding that the second farm would be later transferred into Geoff’s name.

Geoff & Nadia’s first farm home was two steel garages 17ft long X 10ft wide side by side. This provided a kitchen on one side, and two bedrooms on the other. The kitchen had a wood stove and for lighting, they had only kerosene lamps. Geoff & Nadia’s two sons were born in 1966 and 1967 in the Kingscote General Hospital.

The mixed farm

By 1968, they were shearing over 3,000 sheep, milking 30 plus cows, raising 80-100 head of beef cattle, 10-30 pigs and 100-800 fowls, reaping about 50-60 acres of wheat and 40-50 acres of oats, and cutting 50 to 80 acres of hay. Although the farms prospered, Geoff decided there was no long-term future for farming on Kangaroo Island and finally the family shifted back Adelaide in June 1969.

In August 1969 Geoff started working for the National Parks Commission at the Cleland Conservation Park. In January 1972, he was transferred to the Head Office of the National Parks Commission Headquarters at Belair National Park as field assistant to the ecologist – worked at bird banding, research into kookaburra and brushtail possum territories – and travelling over the State looking at possible land for purchase by the National Parks Commission. In late 1973, Geoff was appointed as the State’s relieving ranger for when rangers went on annual leave.

In 1973 to 1976 Geoff went back to night school and completed both his leaving and matriculation certificates and in 1977 started part time studies in geography at Adelaide University.

In early 1976, the Chapman family shifted into the Ranger’s residence at Belair National Park where Geoff was the Acting District Ranger. In 1977, Geoffrey was appointed the District Ranger for the Lower Murraylands and Fleurieu Peninsula Geoff considered his role as District Ranger at Strathalbyn from 1977 to 1980 to be the most enjoyable part of his working life. Being a ranger with the National Parks in those days was not just a job but a highly enjoyable lifestyle. All the rangers felt that they were achieving something for the environment. As the work was so enjoyable, nearly all the rangers spent all their spare time involved with wildlife and parks.

In 1980 Geoffrey was successful in a state Government funded scholarship (1980-1982) to finish an Associate Diploma of Wildlife and Park Management at Salisbury and Roseworthy Colleges, finally completing 42 subjects and 3 field studies. At the end of the scholarship in 1982, Geoff had the choice of returning to the field as a ranger or applying for a new position as Fire and Emergency Officer at Head Office.

In 1982 Geoff’s new Fire and Emergency position was far from what he imagined. It soon became clear that several members of the Country Fire Service (CFS) were anti-National Park. The CFS local fire brigades really did not like to undertake any fire control work in National Parks and often went against any suggestions from park staff of trying to control fires in reserves along control lines. They would prefer to simply light up around the edges of reserves and burn it all out. Geoff found his new role a thankless task at the best of times. Distrust of the National Parks and Wildlife Service’s (NPWS’s) fire management by the Kangaroo Island community was still evident after the 1999-2000 bushfires.

In early 1985 the new Director of NPWS, Bruce Leaver decided to disband the NPWS Fire Operations Unit. He stated the District Rangers carried responsibility for all management issues, including bushfires! Geoff Chapman was offered as Senior Protection Ranger at the Central Region office at Netley – plus the supervision of the State’s Fire Track Maintenance Crew. This work included track crew management and budgets, fire planning, pest plants and animal control. In this period Geoff was encouraged to have annual field days for rangers on innovations and undertake research of various pest plant and animal control programmes including use of biological control with the Waite Institute (examples Boneseed beetle, Bridal Creeper beetles. blackberry rust virus, Polygala pest plant management, biological control etc). From 1985 to 2000 many of the park rangers were leaders in Australia on techniques in pest plants and animal control. Many of the interstate rangers were in awe of the professionalism of South Australian rangers.

In 1991/92, Bruce Leaver closed the Central Region office, staff being transferred to Currie Street Department’s Head Office. Geoff was transferred to Head Office’s Biological Section at Norwood to look after the state’s national parks’ fire planning, equipment replacement and repairs, upgrading the radio network.

From 1994 to 2000, as well as his normal duties, Geoff was appointed as a state representative on the federal Australian Fire Authorities Council and served on several interstate federal Fire Development Committees overseeing the development of Australia-wide fire training, fire operational management, standard firefighting equipment design and new firefighting technology, including aerial bombing operations. In 1998 to 2001, Geoff was seconded to work on the development and implementation of the new South Australia’s whole of government radio communications which included writing specifications and statewide training programmes. His group included SA National Parks, SA Primary Industries, Fisheries, Engineering and Water Supply, SA Forestry and helping with CFS ‘on ground’ new radio management issues.

In September 2001, due to health reasons and stress, Geoff took a separation package from the Department after giving more than 31 years of service. From 2001 to 2009 Geoff worked part time as personal carer for elderly people who had dementia or needed help. It resulted in many numerous humorous situations during help with shopping, showering, dressing and caring. Let’s just say with Geoff’s approach and attitude to life – he was in great demand!

In 2009, when he finally retired Geoff shifted into his house at James Street, Reynella, decided to enjoy life, and overseas travel. Later travelled extensively on interstate bus tours and visiting family & friends. In early 2012, Geoff met his partner Gail, and the two of them started travelling interstate and then went on many annual overseas tours. Geoff’s interest in overseas environment, historical management and the culture was a strong theme. They moved to Victor Harbour in September 2015. Over the years due to his interest in the environment and parks, Geoff continued researching and writing articles and comments on wildlife and natural land management issues.

Geoff has had four major hobbies in his later life: his involvement with Rotary for more than 40 years; then Probus from 2012 to present; genealogy research and writing articles on South Australia’s history; and researching the environment of the lower lakes and Coorong. He also has an interest in gardening and hanging plants.

Geoff’s personal achievements

  • Awarded two Paul Harris fellowship medals for community service to Rotary and the community in 2000 and then in 2012 awarded an additional Paul Harris Sapphire pin
  • In 2013 awarded Australian Medal for Services to South Australian National Parks and the South Australian Country Fire Service
  • Awarded a Bronze medal (10 years) Silver medal (15 years) and a Gold medal (30 years) service with National Parks
  • Presented an Australian Fire Authorities Council of Australasia award in 2011 for services to bushfire research.

There have been many milestone work achievements such as developing “Fire Fitness programmes” and use of computers at fires for management of resources etc. He was a major player with Australian Fire Authorities Council working groups from 1990 to 2000 in developing new fire-fighting plant and equipment, truck designs, protective clothing for fire fighters, aerial operations, fire operations management and techniques such as bushfire foams. Geoff was a major instigator for the introduction of “Gpats” into SA fire services (automatic recoding of lightning strikes operated by the BoM). From 1989 to 1999, Geoff was seconded to CSIRO, NSW, Victorian and Tasmanian Governments on a number of bushfire research and training projects.

Geoff’s achievements were enhanced only by the help of his many work colleagues for which he is very grateful. Most of all, Geoff considered his working life and companionship with other rangers and park staff throughout Australia has been the most interesting, rewarding and enjoyable part of his life.

 

Review Status:

MidCoast Open Space and Recreation Strategy 2023 – 2035

MidCoast Open Space and Recreation Strategy 2023 – 2035 (2025 Review)

The MidCoast Open Space and Recreation Strategy 2023 – 2035 is the most contemporary strategy of its type in Australia, having been adopted by Council in July 2023. It has been reviewed in 2025.

The Strategy is based on an Adaptive Management model, making it unique in Australia for its appreciation of MidCoast’s 4100ha of open space and the activities that the community does on that space as a complete system, needing to be managed for emergent challenges. The Strategy includes an Impact Assessment model that assists Council’s land managers in being able to identify impacts on their parks and reserves, and what measures to put in place to meet those challenges. Primary among those challenges is climate change and impacts from over-use and over-visitation.

The Strategy also includes a new set of parks guiding principles, that once again are focused on the “whole system” rather than just human activity.

Review Status:

MidCoast Walking Cycling and Trail based Activity Strategy

MidCoast Walking Cycling and Trail based Activity Strategy

 

This strategy is part of the MidCoast Parks & Recreation Planning Portfolio, a group of 9 strategies and plans for the management of the 827 parks and reserves, and the activities that take place in them, on the MidCoast of NSW.

 

This strategy sets out a 10 year plan for the management, enhancement and addition of paths and trails throughout our urban, coastal and mountain reserves.

Review Status:

MidCoast Playspace design and maintenance guidelines

Playspace design and maintenance guidelines

 

These guidelines have been developed by play planners and designers, as well as council operational staff who are experienced with play design and maintenance.

Review Status:

Queensland Government Statewide Outdoor Recreation Framework

In 2014 the Queensland Government issued a policy statement endorsed by 17 public authorities, the Local Government Association  and the peak body for outdoor recreation, the Queensland Outdoor Recreation Federation. Titled the Queensland Government Statewide Outdoor Recreation Framework: A Collaborative and Coordinated Approach to Outdoor Recreation in Queensland, to achieve endorsement from such a large number of authorities was no mean feat. The statement was intended to replace an earlier one Queensland Outdoor Recreation Strategic Framework 2009—2014 which had run its course.

The Framework was designed to protect and improve access to outdoor recreation places and spaces; promote outdoor recreation opportunities and participation; and enhance the sustainability and capacity of the outdoor recreation sector.

Yet despite the fact that there is nothing political in the statement, after the government was replaced by one of the opposite partisan denomination the following year, the Framework disappeared from the Department’s public website and public servants were instructed by the incoming government to work on something different.

It is not difficult to be quite angry at the waste of human capital when the work of representatives of 19 different entities is discarded in this manner. Anyone who has worked in an interdepartmental role will understand how time-consuming it is to gain endorsement of their agency to a multilateral policy position.

It gets worse. By law, all Queensland publishers, including government departments, commercial organisations, clubs, churches, societies and private individuals, are required by law to deposit one copy of their publications with State Library of Queensland (SLQ). The document appears in the SLQ catalogue, but clicking on the hotlink within the catalogue record yields the following message:

Oops, page does not exist!

Fortunately, the Queensland Outdoor Recreation Federation (now Outdoors Queensland) salvaged a copy and PaRC is pleased to re-present it here.

Researchers in this field should also search the PaRC Document Library which includes a number of reports on the subject, including the Outdoor Recreation Demand Studies of 1998 and 2007.

Review Status: Pending

Natural Turf Sporting Fields – Sydney’s North Shore

This 2025 report by AgEnviro Solutions and Turf NSW examines opportunities on Sydney’s North Shore to expand the carrying capacity of existing sporting fields. It examines existing infrastructure including turf cultivars, drainage, soils and lighting. Some of the most striking findings are:

  • only 20% of fields have a wear tolerant turf cultivar;
  • 25% of fields do not have lights (severely limiting use);.
  • if all existing fields were upgraded to Best Practice (and had lights) then the carrying capacity could be increased by over 290%, providing ample capacity for existing users plus room for significant growth in population and/or participation.

 

Review Status: Pending

Sports Field Best Practice Guidelines – NSW

The 2025 best-practice guidelines for NSW sporting fields provide help with:

  • understanding the science and evidence to improve the planning, design, construction, and management of community sporting fields, and common limitations;
  • flexible, outcomes-focused principles to develop solutions tailored to local conditions while achieving best practice;
  • understanding sporting field performance benchmarks, including water use, playability, and carrying capacity;
  • optimising the performance, resilience, and sustainability of sporting fields to meet our social, recreational, environmental, and economic outcomes;
  • making more effective use of financial resources;
  • comparing different sports field construction types, such as perched water table, best practice, and hybrids.

The guidelines are based on data from detailed assessments of fields across NSW, including:

  • irrigation systems from about 100 sporting fields;
  • soil, playing surface condition, micro-climate, and sport wear levels from about 2,000 sporting fields.
Review Status: Pending

Land tenure and outdoor recreation

In 2014 the Queensland Government published a Discussion Paper envisaging freeholding some of the public land estate. The Queensland Outdoor Recreation Federation (now Outdoors Queensland) commissioned a report titled Underpinning the Foundations of the Four Pillars, a submission critiquing the proposals. A copy of the State’s Discussion Paper Strengthening our economic future has been annotated with detailed comments by QORF’s consultant.

 

Review Status: Pending

Land value taxation – Henry George’s legacy – by Phil Day

Dr Phil Day was a powerful and long-standing advocate for land value taxation, a modest form of which is retained in municipal rating of the unimproved value of land.

Land value taxation, if extended beyond the minimalist scale currently adopted, would have large implications for the setting aside of open space in developing localities.

This compilation includes:

Taxing Land Instead of Taxing Incomes, journal article in Progress, June 1987.

Relief for the Needy, Not a Gift to Their Heirs with Doug Tucker, 14 November 1988.

Submission to Industry Commission on Draft Taxation and Financial Policy Impacts Report, 17 December 1992.

Profiting from Land, Ockham’s Razor, ABC, 22 June 1993.

Land, Luddites and Lemmings – Address to Georgist Council of Australia Conference, 1 October 1993.

Correspondence with the Centre for Incentive Taxation, England, 24 January 1994.

Tax Reform: The “Great Adventure” or GST merry-go-round. Letter to Editor, 3 March 1998.

Correspondence to the Sydney Morning Herald, 4 March 1998.

Widen the Tax Reform Agenda, Ockham’s Razor, ABC, 26 June 1997.

Tax Reform, the Environment and the Reconciliation Process, 15 April 1998

The Political Economy of Land: Putting Henry George in His Place, 21 September 2004.

Resignation from the Henry George Foundation, 7 December 1999.

 

Phil Day wrote an informative summary of betterment taxes for the Department of Natural Resources in Queensland in 2002.

 

 

to be continued.

Review Status: Pending

Regionalisation and regional development – Phil Day

Dr Phil Day was a tier 1 advocate of regional development, as explained in a separate post. His personal papers contained a selection of press releases, letters to editors and speeches to conferences on the subject of regional or balanced development. This compilation includes:

  • “Regionalisation”, 13 August 1974
  • “Dynamics of Regional Development” and “Regionalism Resurgent?, papers  to a National Conference on Regional Development, 30 August 1974
  • press releases on the North Queensland New State Party, 12 July 1977 and 28 July 1977
  • North Queensland New State Party Conference, 1 September 1977
  • correspondence, 30 July 1980
  • “Towns in Search of a City” (Canberra”), 22 August 1984
  • letters to the editor of two newspapers, 25 May 1997 and 2 February 2002.

The papers are in chronological order. Scanning of the first of these papers is rather suboptimal but the other papers in the compilation are quite legible and provide a valuable insight into Dr Day’s deep insights into the issues.

Review Status: Pending

Aquatic fauna of Hotel Creek adj. Barrington Tops National Park

This charming report of 117 pages by biologist Evelyn Elfick commences with a generic explanation of aquatic systems then includes a list of some 89 aquatic invertebrates identified during a survey, with information and original drawings for each one. Hotel Creek is in the Chichester State Forest adjacent to Barrington Tops National Park in central New South Wales.

Although the title is Aquatic Insects of the Chichester State Forest, the list of fauna includes one fish (a gudgeon) and several molluscs, crustaceans and other invertebrates that are not insects.

The introductory ~20 pages could form a useful introduction to aquatic systems for secondary-level teachers as it is not site-specific.

Evelyn Elfick has supplied the following explanation by way of background:

“While studying as an undergraduate at the University of New England, I started collecting for a visiting lecturer from the USA. Her PhD was on freshwater aquatic insects and I collected ephemeroptera [mayflies] from rivers and streams from the South Coast at Bega to just north of the Hunter.

“I became so interested in the diversity of the then “unpolluted” freshwater systems that I decided to continue and chose Burra Creek as the main study area. This booklet was originally produced in A5 format to be used as a field guide for people working in the area.”

Evelyn may be contacted via elfick AT SYMBOL bigpond.com.

 

 

Review Status: Pending